Lesson 16 · 50 min · introductory
The Qubit
A qubit is the smallest quantum system: a unit vector in , defined only up to a global phase. This lesson derives the normalisation condition from Postulates 1 and 3, counts the real parameters of a pure qubit state () and builds the explicit parametrisation , maps spin-, photon polarisation and transmon circuits onto , and tabulates the six cardinal states together with the full table of overlaps that makes the , and bases mutually unbiased.
Prerequisites: Postulate 3: Projective Measurement & the Born Rule
Objectives and key results
Derive from the state-space and measurement postulates and normalise any nonzero vector .
Prove that a pure qubit state has exactly two real parameters and write it as with , .
Identify in three physical platforms: spin- along , photon polarisation , and the two lowest levels of a transmon.
Write the six cardinal states as column vectors and compute every overlap between them.
- definition · Qubit state
- theorem · Two real parameters
- identity · Mutually unbiased Pauli bases
- formula · Normalisation
From the postulates to normalisation#
Stage 1 established the postulates for an arbitrary Hilbert space . A qubit is the special case , the smallest Hilbert space in which superposition is possible. We fix an orthonormal basis, the computational basis so that every vector of is uniquely with . The complex numbers and are the probability amplitudes. Not every pair is a physical state; the postulates cut the set down in two ways, one of which (normalisation) we derive now and the other (global phase) in the next section.
Definition
Qubit
A qubit is a quantum system whose state space is . Its pure states are unit vectors with , and two unit vectors that differ by a global phase, with , describe the same physical state.
Normalisation from Postulates 1 and 3
- Step 1:Postulate 1: the state of an isolated system is a unit vector of its Hilbert space, here .
- Step 2:Expand in the computational basis; the bra is the conjugate transpose, so the coefficients are complex-conjugated.
- Step 3:The inner product is linear in the ket and antilinear in the bra, giving four terms.
- Step 4:Orthonormality kills the cross terms, and .
- Step 5:Postulate 3 (Born rule) for the measurement with projectors , .
- Step 6:The two outcomes are exhaustive and exclusive, so their probabilities must sum to one; this is exactly the unit-norm condition of Postulate 1, so the two postulates are consistent.
Result
Worked example: normalising
- Step 1:An unnormalised vector: , .
- Step 2:Modulus squared of a complex number is the number times its conjugate; .
- Step 3:Add the squared moduli (the derivation above with general coefficients).
- Step 4:Divide by the norm ; the result has unit norm because .
- Step 5:Real and imaginary parts, to four decimals.
- Step 6:Born rule on the normalised amplitudes; the check confirms the normalisation.
Result
Quick check
Normalise . What is ?
Two real parameters#
Two complex numbers are four real numbers, so . Normalisation is one real equation, which leaves the unit sphere (three real parameters). The global phase is one more real redundancy: Postulate 3 gives for every basis and every measurement, and Postulate 2 gives , so no experiment can distinguish from . Removing it leaves real parameters.
Canonical form of a pure qubit state
Every unit vector equals for some , and . The pair is unique when ; at the poles the value of is irrelevant.
Proof (6 steps)
- Step 1:Polar form of the two amplitudes: four real numbers , the count.
- Step 2:Normalisation removes one real parameter.
- Step 3:is a point of the unit circle in the closed first quadrant; is its polar angle, where both cosine and sine are non-negative.
- Step 4:Factor out of both terms.
- Step 5:Only the relative phase survives inside the bracket; is a global phase and is physically irrelevant, which removes the second real parameter.
- Step 6:Two real parameters remain. If both , so are defined modulo and is unique; at () or () one phase is undefined, so is arbitrary.
∎
Quick check
Which state is physically identical to ?
Reading the canonical form off two amplitudes. The amplitude editor below draws and as points of two complex planes and prints the norm , the Born probabilities , and the Bloch angles of the theorem, and . This first copy is a fixed display of ; the derivation shows where each of its numbers comes from.
Every number shown for
- Step 1:The modulus squared of is the number times its conjugate; . The vector is already a unit vector.
- Step 2:Born rule; dividing by is harmless here because .
- Step 3:Polar forms: lies on the positive real axis and on the positive imaginary axis.
- Step 4:The theorem's with ; consistently .
- Step 5:The relative phase; the global phase is .
- Step 6:Reassemble the canonical form: .
Result
Normalise by hand, then by button. The second editor is interactive and starts from the unnormalised pair , without automatic normalisation, so it reports . Derive its numbers first (below), then press Normalise, which divides both amplitudes by , and compare. Afterwards drag the handles or type a modulus and an argument. Two things never change the probabilities: rescaling both amplitudes by the same positive factor (the editor divides by ) and turning both handles by the same angle (a global phase leaves , and unchanged, hence also and ). Moving one handle to the origin puts the state at a pole, where is undefined and shown as a dash.
Normalising
- Step 1:Squared moduli as in the worked example of the first section; .
- Step 2:Divide by the norm : this is what the Normalise button does.
- Step 3:and ; the editor shows the same bars before and after normalising, because it always divides by .
- Step 4:lies in the first quadrant, so its argument is ; .
Result
Born probabilities versus measured frequencies#
The Born rule predicts probabilities; an experiment returns counts. Measuring identically prepared copies of in the basis gives outcome on each copy independently with probability , so the observed frequency of is a random variable centred on . How far it may stray follows from the binomial distribution.
Spread of the measured frequency and the statistic
- Step 1:counts the shots with outcome : a sum of independent Bernoulli variables, each with probability .
- Step 2:A Bernoulli variable has mean and variance ; means and (for independent terms) variances add.
- Step 3:Dividing a random variable by divides its standard deviation by ; .
- Step 4:Central limit theorem: with the binomial is close to a normal distribution, and standard deviations hold of a normal law.
- Step 5:With and the two deviations are equal up to sign, and .
- Step 6:Two bins whose counts must add up to leave degree of freedom; is approximately standard normal, so has mean and exceeds in about of runs.
Result
What to read in the histogram. The exact bars are the Born probabilities and ; next to them are the frequencies of shots drawn from a seeded generator (seed , so the same sample appears on every visit). The two sampled bars differ from the exact ones by the same amount in opposite directions, typically by about one standard deviation , and the line reports the statistic above with degree of freedom. Values up to about are what chance alone produces in of runs; a value far beyond, say , would mean the samples were not drawn from the Born distribution. Because scales as , quadrupling the number of shots only halves the typical deviation, to : estimating amplitudes from measurements is expensive, a theme that returns with shot noise in variational algorithms.
Physical qubits#
The abstract space is realised by any physical system with two perfectly distinguishable states that can be put into coherent superposition. Three platforms and their identification of the computational basis:
- Spin- along (electron, nucleus, trapped-ion hyperfine pseudo-spin). The observable has eigenstates with eigenvalue and with eigenvalue . The map is , , so a Stern–Gerlach apparatus oriented along performs the measurement, and spin up along is .
- Photon polarisation. Horizontal and vertical linear polarisation are orthogonal: , . A polarising beam splitter transmitting and reflecting is the measurement; diagonal polarisation is , and circular polarisation is (the sign-to-handedness assignment is a convention).
- Transmon (superconducting circuit). A Josephson-junction anharmonic oscillator has levels with . Microwave pulses at the frequency address only the lowest pair, so the qubit is (ground) and (first excited); the anharmonicity keeps population out of (leakage).
The six cardinal states and mutually unbiased bases#
The eigenvectors of the three Pauli matrices give six distinguished states, the cardinal states, lying at the six poles of the Bloch sphere: They satisfy , , and . For instance . Each pair is an orthonormal basis: the basis , the basis and the basis .
Step-by-step overlap
- Step 1:The bra is the conjugate transpose; the entries are real, so conjugation does nothing.
- Step 2:Row times column.
- Step 3:Modulus squared via the complex conjugate.
- Step 4:For comparison, within the basis: conjugating in the bra is essential; forgetting it would give , the wrong answer.
- Step 5:Overlaps with the basis read off the column vectors directly; every modulus squared is .
- Step 6:All four – overlaps have the form with , whose modulus squared is .
Result
Definition
Mutually unbiased bases
Two orthonormal bases and of are mutually unbiased if for all . The table shows that the , and bases are pairwise mutually unbiased with : preparing any state of one basis and measuring in another gives a perfectly uniform outcome, so a measurement in one basis reveals no information about which state of another basis was prepared. This is the property exploited by the BB84 key-distribution protocol.
Circuit · 1 qubit
Preparing from : , then multiplies the amplitude by , giving with amplitudes and statistics .
- |0⟩0.5
- |1⟩0.5
Quick check
Compute .
References
- M. A. Nielsen and I. L. Chuang, Quantum Computation and Quantum Information, 10th anniversary ed., Cambridge University Press (2010), §1.2 and §2.2.
- P. Krantz et al., A quantum engineer’s guide to superconducting qubits, Applied Physics Reviews 6, 021318 (2019).doi:10.1063/1.5089550
- W. K. Wootters and B. D. Fields, Optimal state-determination by mutually unbiased measurements, Annals of Physics 191, 363 (1989).doi:10.1016/0003-4916(89)90322-9
Hands-on labs
Normalise a qubit state
1 step · auto-gradedOpen labNormalise and read off its Born probability .